The applicants are entities that own pharmacies and applying for leave to appeal against the validity of the Regulations relating to a Transparent Pricing System for Medicines and Scheduled Substances. The major issues in question are whether the fees were appropriate and the regulation of the single exit price was legal. Leave to appeal was granted and the first respondent was ordered to pay the costs including the costs of two counsel.

The applicant seeks an order reviewing and setting aside the decision of the Board. The applicant is a citizen of the United Kingdom and applied for permanent resident status in terms of section 25 of the Aliens Control Act, 1991. His application was rejected by the Immigrants Selection Board. The decision of the Board was set aside and respondents ordered to pay the costs of the application.

The applicant was applying for an order that declared that he had a right, priviledge of being permanently resident in the Republic of South Africa and entering the Republic without a visa. The applicant is a Xhosa - speaking male whose present residential address is Nkqonkqweni, Peelton, a village situated east of the railway line between East London and Queenstown. The application was dismissed with costs including of two counsel.

The Minister of Home Affairs seeks a Court order to confirm an order agreed upon by the parties. The respondent is a South African citizen married a Senegalese national in Johannesburg. The application was dismissed.

The applicants seek an order to declare section 25 of the Act to be inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 and hence invalid to this extent. The order was granted. Respondents were ordered to jointly and severally pay the applicants' costs including of two counsel.

The applicants seek an order to condone their non-compliance with the time limits prescribed by the Uniform Rules of the Court and permitting the application to be heard as a matter of urgency. The applicant is a South African watchmaker, resident in Cape Town and married to a woman of Thai national, who is not a permanent resident in South Africa. The order was granted. Costs of the application were to be costs in the appeal.

(Volumes 2 and 3 are missing)

The applicants, citizens of Zaire, claiming to be refugees seek as a matter of urgency, an interim interdict directing the respondents to renew and or to extend the applicants' temporary permits and those of their children, to remain in South Africa under the same conditions as applied to such permits. The applicants were granted an interim interdict.

This is an appeal against the amendment of the respondents plea. The applicants are the editor, owner and publisher and journalist of the Pretoria News. The appeal was dismissed with costs including of two counsel.

The applicant was appealing against the respondent's decision to ban the publication 'Varsity' as it was seen as offensive and harmful to public morals. The applicant is the editor of the publication Varsity. The appeal was dismissed.