The applicants were seeking relief against their dismissal at work. The applicants, a customer support clerk and a library services supervisor were accused of theft and both dismissed from work. The court ordered the respondent to reinstate the applicants.

The applicants were seeking relief for being unlawfully and unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The respondent was ordered to reinstate the applicants on terms and conditions no less favourable than those prevailing on the 16th of May 1985 and no order was made as to costs.

The applicants were seeking an order to declare their eviction unlawful. The applicants have lived on the farm Blaaukrantz in the district of Weenen for some years and the owner was now evicting them. The respondent was interdicted from unlawfully damaging or destroying any structural property owned or occupied by first applicant, rebuild the huts and fences demolished by him and pay the costs of the application.

The applicant sought an order declaring the conditions of release to be invalid and that the costs of suit including the costs of two counsel be paid by the second respondent. The application succeeded to the limited extent that the fourth condition of release imposed by the second respondent on the applicant was declared void.

This is the application by the parents of the detainees declaring the arrest and detention of their children wrongful and unlawful. The applicants' children were detained under the State of Emergency. The application was dismissed with costs.