Showing 292 results

Archival description
Legal Resources Centre, Records Subseries
Print preview View:

The Community of Driefontein vs Minister of Co-operation and Development and Others. Case No: Unknown

The applicants were seeking an order to stop the respondents from evicting them. The land in dispute was bought by Pixley ka Isaka Seme in 1912 and it was divided into 310 plots which were sold to various individuals. In the early 1960's, government officials told the Driefontein community that they were going to be removed because Driefontein constitutes a "Black spot". There was a community resistance to that and it has continued till to the present day. The Heyshope Dam was planned and 84 Driefontein plots fall within the "purchase line" for the dam. Most of the court case documents are missing.

Frans Monana and Others vs The State. Case No: A883/81

The applicants were seeking relief against their convictions and sentences. The applicants are among 177 people charged with contravening Section 18(1) of the Black Labour Relations Regulation Act, No. 48 of 1953 and were all convicted. Each applicant was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, suspended for 5 years on certain conditions. The convictions and sentences of the applicants were set aside.

Linda Mario Mogale vs The State. Case No: 329/79

The applicant was seeking an order to declare his conviction and sentence unlawful. The applicant, a young black man was found guilty in the Transvaal Provincial Division, FS Steyn on three counts of manslaughter (counts 1, 2 and 3), three counts of arson, three counts of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, 3 charges of malicious injury to property, and a charge of involvement in terrorist activities, namely a contravention of section of the Terrorism Act 1967. The appeal succeeded and the conviction and sentence were set aside.

Sugar Manufacturing and Refining Employers' Association vs The National Union of Sugar Manufacturing and Refining Employees. Case No: Unknown

This is a determination of the court that for the employees that are engaged or employed in the Sugar Manufacturing and Refining Industry, the classes of work discussed in court do fall within the said Industry and the agreement was not binding or applicable to but that conditions of employment other than on an agricultural basis should be negotiated between parties concerned.

Results 11 to 20 of 292