This is a dispute between applicants and the respondents about the ownership of the land awarded to the descendants of John Dunn. The application was dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicants.

This case is about whether a law which permits the sale in execution of people's homes because they have not paid their debts, thereby removing their security of tenure, violates the right to have access to adequate housing. The applicant is the registered owner of Erf 1825 Prince Albert on which a dwelling has been erected. A judgment was obtained by default against the applicant in an amount of R632, 45, interest thereon and costs in respect of monies lent and advance. The applicant's immovable property was attached to a warrant of execution and sold to the respondent. The order of the High Court was set aside.

The respondents were appealing against the applicants' decision to set aside a part of the TAC (Total Allowable Catch). The respondents felt that the second applicant did not know what he was doing. The application was dismissed with costs including those of two counsel.

This is a leave to appeal application by the respondent against the applicants' decision. The respondent launched a proceeding in the Cape High Court seeking the decision of the applicants be reviewed and set aside. The application was successful and the court granted leave to appeal.

Case concerns intestate estates of black people; it was contended that black women and children (except the oldest son of deceased) are discriminated against in customary law.

This is an appeal against an order of the Pretoria High Court. The dispute arose from a special examination the Council conducted in September 1998 to enable South African citizens or permanent residents with foreign veterinary qualifications to qualify for registration under the South African legislation. The appeal succeeded with costs.

The application concerns the constitutional validity of sections 8, 10(2), 12, 16(1), 29, 33, 34, 37, and 41(4) of the Pound Ordinance number 32 of 1947. The applicant is a 53 year old widow, unemployed, landless and residing at Thornview Farm, Greytown KwaZulu-Natal. She is the owner of livestock that is threatened with seizure and impoundment. The first respondent is responsible for the administration and implementation inKwaZulu-Natal of the Pound Ordinance no. 32 of 1947. The second and third respondents are Poundkeepers for Dundee Pound and Weenen Pound respectively. The above mentioned sections of the Pound Ordinance were declared to be inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. There was no order to costs.

This is an application for leave to appeal which rose from the question of who bears responsibility for ensuring the safety of passengers travelling on commuter trains. A train commuter was stabbed in a train and died the following day. This happened during a period when numbers of security staff on commuter trains were significantly reduced. Leave for appeal was granted.

The applicant was seeking the order to evict respondents from applicant's land described as the road reserve parallel to Sheffield road in Phillipi. The applicant's appeal was dismissed with costs.

Re: transfer of land in KZN from the SA government to a trust, resulting in the land being controlled by chiefs.