The applicant was seeking an order to declare the following regulations to be of no force and effect in law: regulation 7(i)(a) and any part of regulation of regulation 12(b), the reference to the United Democratic Front in the prohibition order and the definition of "news agency business" contained in regulation 1, 11 and sub paragraph (xi) of paragraph (a) of the subversive statement in regulation 1 and 9(2)(a)(v) of the media emergency regulations. The application was dismissed with costs.

This is the appeal against the arrest and detention of the applicant. The applicant is a member of an Indian group and unlawfully occupied premises in a White group area. She was arrested and sentenced to a fine of R50 of 15 days imprisonment, suspended for 3 years on condition that she doesn't commit the same offence. Judgment to be announced.

The two applicants were arrested and detained by the police in terms of Section 50 (1) of the Internal Security Act no. 74 of 1982. They were contending whether their detention was legal or not. The applications were dismissed with costs including the fees of two counsel.

The applicants were seeking an order to prevent them from appearing in court to answer questions. They were subpoenaed to appear before the magistrate at Bloemfontein to be examined in regard to offences which were being investigated against Winnie Mandela. The appeal was upheld and the sentences imposed by the magistrate were set aside.

This is an application in which eight applicants, being relatives of certain detainees, claim as a matter of urgency that this Court should declare the detention orders issued by the second respondent unlawful and the detainees be released forthwith. The application was dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicants jointly and severally.

The applicants were now appealing against their convictions and sentences. The applicants were convicted of contravening section 1(1) (a) of the Trespass Act no.6 of 1959. The appeal succeeded, the conviction and sentences of all applicants were set aside.

The applicant was arrested at the African Food and Canning Workers' Union office in East London by members of the security branch of the South African Police. The applicant sued the respondent for damages in the sum of R25 000.00 for unlawful arrest and detention. The applicant was awarded R22 000.00.

The applicant was seeking relief against the sentence imposed on him by the respondent. The applicant, a medical doctor was convicted for refusing to render military service in the South African Defence Force on the grounds of conscience. The appeal succeeded.

The respondent in this appeal was detained in terms of emergency regulations. In April 1993 he received legal advice to the effect that the regulations under which he had been detained were invalid for being in conflict with Ciskei's Bill of Rights. He was advised to apply to court for an order declaring section 48 (1) of the Police Act to be unlawful for being in conflict with Ciskei's Bill of Rights. The appeal was upheld.