This is the appeal against the arrest and detention of the applicant. The applicant is a member of an Indian group and unlawfully occupied premises in a White group area. She was arrested and sentenced to a fine of R50 of 15 days imprisonment, suspended for 3 years on condition that she doesn't commit the same offence. Judgment to be announced.

The applicant who is an adult Black male, born and brought up in the town Engcobo in the Transkei. He was seeking an order declaring that he was entitled in terms Urban Areas Act to remain in the prescribed area and directing the second respondent to endorse his reference book to that effect. The court ruled in favour of the applicant.

The applicant seeks judgment against the respondent of the sum of R 1 000.00. The applicant was walking in a public road in the area of Chartwell when the dogs of the respondent bit and injured him while the respondent just watched and allowed his dogs to continue with the attack. The applicant received enormous wounds on the upper left arm, right hand, left ear, behind the head and on his nose which is affecting his left eye. As a result of these injuries he is unable to work. The case was dismissed with costs.

The applicants were applying for default judgment against the respondents. The applicant is a state owned company and the respondents are the trade union and its members. The applicant's application for default judgment and for costs was declined and also the respondent's application was dismissed.

This is a determination of an alleged unfair labour practice by the respondent to the applicants' clients. The applicant is a trade union seeking the reinstatement of its members to their employment as they were dismissed because they drew attention of the applicant to the irregularity of the respondent. The outcome of the determination was that the applicants' clients have to be formally reinstated.

The applicants were applying for the reinstatement of the second applicant to effect payment of all wages and benefits from the date of his purported dismissal until the date of his reinstatement. The applicants are the trade union and its member, who was dismissed from work for not wanting to be re - tested at the Municipality. The application was declined.

The applicants seek an order to order the respondent to reinstate the applicants back to their employment and to restore labour practices which existed prior to the dismissal. The applicants are a trade union for mineworkers and its members and the respondent is a mining company. The respondent was ordered to reinstate the applicants' clients back to their employment and no order was made to costs.

The applicant was seeking reinstatement of the applicants' clients and remuneration. The applicant is a trade union and its clients were dismissed due to disagreements about the new rooster the respondent introduced. No determination was made as to costs.

The applicant was appealing against the respondent's decision to ban the publication 'Varsity' as it was seen as offensive and harmful to public morals. The applicant is the editor of the publication Varsity. The appeal was dismissed.

The applicants were seeking an order reviewing and setting aside the decision of the Administration Board Western Cape to increase the tariffs of rents, site and service charges in the Mbekweni residential area, Paarl. The application was dismissed with costs in respect of the second applicant. The costs were awarded against first and second respondents jointly and severally.