Incomplete and various court proceedings and notes relating to the 1990s trial, see A3 and A4, probably relating in part to Winnie Mandel's request for further particulars.

In re State v Patrick M Baleka and others (Delmas Trial TPACC 492/85) in the Supreme Court (Appellate Division. Case No: 54/89. 1989).

(LM Mogale was an 18-year-old student involved in Soweto in 1977/78. He was convicted of culpable homicide, assault, damage to property, contravening the provisions of the Terrorism Act, and sentenced to 7 years imprisonment. This case is his appeal (see also ADà., AK à..).

These two æTerrorism' cases were substantively the same. The original 22 (Samson Ndou et al) who had been charged with terrorism, alternatively forwarding the aims of the ANC, were found not guilty in February 1970, discharged and immediately rearrested, and charged again together with Benjamin Ramotse who had been arrested in Botswana in 1968 (Benjamin Ramotse et al).á30f 1969/1970

In the case of the second trial Ramotse made a plea that his arrest was in violation of international law, the others including Samson Ndou made a plea that they had already been acquitted on the same charge. (Their plea was successful, Ramotse's unsuccessful).

The applicant claims restoration of a farm originally known as Kranspoort No 1849 in terms of section 25(7) of the Constitution. The respondent is the current owner and opposes the claim. The court declared that the applicant was entitled to restitution in terms of the Restitution of Land Rights Act No 22 of 1994.

This is an appeal concerning the application of s 6(1) of the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998. The applicants have occupied a privately owned land and the respondents have applied to the court for an eviction order. The appeal was dismissed with costs. Judgments in the High Court, E Cape, Supreme Court and Constitutional Court.

The applicants were appealing against eviction from land in the Ventersdorp district. The application was dismissed and no order as to costs.

The applicant was seeking the order to evict respondents from applicant's land described as the road reserve parallel to Sheffield road in Phillipi. The applicant's appeal was dismissed with costs.