The applicant, a university student was appealing against the judgment delivered by the Magistrate. The applicant was arrested for trespass when asked to leave the police station. The magistrate held that the applicant failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities and dismissed his claim with costs. The appeal was allowed with costs.

The applicant was seeking the order to evict respondents from applicant's land described as the road reserve parallel to Sheffield road in Phillipi. The applicant's appeal was dismissed with costs.

The applicant was seeking an order to evict respondents and all who hold title under them from 8 Recifehof, Surran Road, Hanover Park, Western Cape; and respondents to bear the costs of the application. The applicant is the registered owner of the property and the respondents are unlawful occupiers of the applicant's property. The order was granted and the respondents to pay the costs of the application.

This is an appeal against the judgment of the court: In an earlier case the applicant obtained an ex parte order against the respondent and the respondent opposed the confirmation of the rule nisi and the court discharged the rule and ordered the applicant to pay the costs. The appeal was dismissed with costs.

The applicant seeks the Court review and set aside the third respondent's finding and decision that he was guilty under the provisions of section 20(f) of the Act on the bases that the third respondent. The applicant is a medical practitioner and specialist in public health since 1997 by the Health Department of the Eastern Cape Provincial government as the head of the Department of Public Health at Cecilia Makiwane Hospital. He made a public statement criticising the Minister of Health for refusing to provide a drug known as AZT to pregnant women living with HIV. An article was published in a newspaper stating that he was gathering support to seek manslaughter charges against the Minister of Health and a disciplinary action was taken against him. The appeal succeeded.

The applicant was seeking an order declaring regulation 3(6) of the regulations proclaimed on 12 June 1986 under Proclamation No.109 of 1986 and the conditions of release served upon second and third applicants invalid. The applicants are a federation of trade unions, a trade union and employee of the first applicant. The conditions of release served upon the second and third applicants and signed by the second respondent were declared invalid. The costs of the application were to be paid jointly and severally by the first and second respondents.

The applicants were seeking an order to declare their arrest unlawful. They were arrested and charged in Springs for contravening the Riotous Assemblies Act No.17 of 1956, as amended, read with Section 2(3) (A) of the Act and Government Notice No. 1667 of the 3rd of September 1976. The conviction and sentence in each instance were set aside.

The applicant was arrested at the African Food and Canning Workers' Union office in East London by members of the security branch of the South African Police. The applicant sued the respondent for damages in the sum of R25 000.00 for unlawful arrest and detention. The applicant was awarded R22 000.00.

The applicant seeks an order reviewing and setting aside the decision of the Board. The applicant is a citizen of the United Kingdom and applied for permanent resident status in terms of section 25 of the Aliens Control Act, 1991. His application was rejected by the Immigrants Selection Board. The decision of the Board was set aside and respondents ordered to pay the costs of the application.