The applicant was seeking relief from the respondent, the Minister of Police, damages of R36 000 - 00 said to have been sustained at 18h30 on 11 February 1986 near a street called NY108 in Gugulethu. She was struck in the neck by a projectile fired by a member of the South African Police which damaged her vocal chords. The applicant was awarded R14000, costs of the application and of the postponement.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondent. The applicant in her capacity was representing her son who was shot and paralysed by police during the riots on the 11th November 1985 at Kings Street, Paballelo, Upington. He was shot at close range by SAP shotgun fire as he stood outside his grandmother's home. The respondent was ordered to pay the applicant R1 400 000 - 00 and the costs of the two counsel.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a decision of Judge Goldstone. The applicant instituted an action against the respondent for payment of damages arising from an alleged assault perpetrated on him by a member of the police force. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs including those of two counsel.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondents' abuse. The applicant is a farm worker who was subjected to a practice of beatings by the respondents to induce fear to work. The matter was settled in Judge's chambers.

This is the appeal against the arrest and detention of the applicant. The applicant is a member of an Indian group and unlawfully occupied premises in a White group area. She was arrested and sentenced to a fine of R50 of 15 days imprisonment, suspended for 3 years on condition that she doesn't commit the same offence. Judgment to be announced.

The applicant was seeking an order to declare the Section 48 (1) of the Police Act No. 32 of 1983 unlawful and of no force and effect. It was declared that the provisions of Section 48(1) of the Police Act No. 32 of 1983 have not been of force and effect since 5th of February 1991. The respondents were ordered to pay the costs of the application jointly and severally such costs include the costs of two counsel.

The applicant was arrested, detained and assaulted by the police and the magistrate dismissed the application made by the applicant seeking relief. In this application, the applicant seeks a review of the magistrate's decision. The application was successful and the order was issued in terms set out in prayers 1, 2, 3 and 4 of the notice of motion.

The applicants were seeking an order reviewing and setting aside the proceedings in Case No 162/96, declaring that sections 116(2)(b) and 116(3) of the Criminal Procedure Act 13 of 1983 are inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993. The applicants are brothers who were charged for wrongfully and lawfully and intentionally steal some green mealies and pumpkins. They pleaded not guilty and were convicted and sentenced to four months imprisonment. Leave to appeal was granted.

The applicant was seeking an order declaring emergency regulations contained in Proclamation 11 of 1991, promulgated on 29 October 1991 invalid. Applicant was advised to seek additional relief and the costs were awarded to the applicant.