The applicant was seeking an order to restraining the first respondent from considering the appeal lodged with him by the second respondent against the refusal of an exemption by the applicant. The applicant is the industrial council for the furniture manufacturing industry and the respondents are minister of manpower and furniture manufacturers. The application was dismissed and the applicant ordered to pay the second respondent's costs excluding those incurred in connection with the matter.

Accused of high treason, alternatively participating in terroristic activities

The applicant is an heir and resides in a house in Umlazi township. He earlier received a rule nisi against the respondents to consider the applicant's preferential claim to house C.1266. The audi alteram partem rule was confirmed, the respondents were ordered to pay the costs of the application and the counter application was dismissed with costs.

The applicant approached court for an order that the decision of second respondent to charge rentals at variance with those as notified by the Minister in notice be reviewed, corrected and set aside. The applicant lives with his wife and family at 13 (B) Zwelethemba Township, Worcester. The application was dismissed with costs.

This is a determination of the court. The respondent retrenched the applicants' clients and agreed to reinstate them when the applicant approached the court for a determination in terms of section 46(9) of the Labour Relations Act, 1956. The applicant is a trade union for textile workers and the respondent a manufacturing textile company which retrenched the applicant's members. The respondent agreed to reinstate the employees on the same terms and conditions of service.

The applicants were seeking an order to interdict, restrain and prevent the respondents from dismissing or altering the terms and conditions of employment of any employee because the respondents suspect that the employee belongs or has belonged to the Union or taken part in the lawful activities of the Union. It was both agreed by the parties that the applicant would be recognised if it can show that it has more than 50% of respondent's employees.

Accused of displaying ANC flag at a funeral and singing ANC songs

Accused of furthering the aims of the Communist Party. The respondents were found not guilty and the case was dismissed.

This is an appeal to reinstate the applicants back to their employment. The applicants are trade unions who are representing their members who were dismissed for refusing to return to work due to insufficient wage increases. Both orders were refused.

The applicants were seeking an order to reinstate its members and effect payment of arrear wages. The applicant is a trade union and its members are the employees of the respondent, a wire weaving manufacturer. The case was dismissed.