The applicant was applying for an order that declared that he had a right, priviledge of being permanently resident in the Republic of South Africa and entering the Republic without a visa. The applicant is a Xhosa - speaking male whose present residential address is Nkqonkqweni, Peelton, a village situated east of the railway line between East London and Queenstown. The application was dismissed with costs including of two counsel.

The applicants sought an order to reinstate second and third applicants and effect payment to them of all wage benefits from the date of dismissal until the date of their reinstatement. The applicants are the trade union and its members who were dismissed for threatening a fellow with violence. The second and third applicants were reinstated in their employment.

This is an appeal against the decision of the first respondent in refusing the appellant's application for an exemption from the provisions of clauses and of the main agreement of the Industrial Council. The applicant is a trade union for the textile workers and the respondent is a council for the clothing industry. The appeal was upheld.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondent to have his reference book endorsed for a permit to remain in the prescribed area of Paarl. The applicant was employed as a driver by the Cape Provincial Administration. Relief was granted by the court.

This is an application for an order to direct the respondent to restore the labour practice and reinstate the applicants' clients on terms and conditions not less favourable to them than those that governed their employment prior to dismissal. The applicant is a trade union representing mine workers and the respondent a mining company. The respondent was ordered to reinstate applicant's clients.

The applicant applied for execution of the judgment should leave to appeal be granted to the respondent. The court ruled that Joseph Katofa be released from detention immediately. The costs of the application were to be costs in the appeal.

The applicants seek an order to reinstate them back to their employment. They are employees of the respondent who embarked on an illegal strike. The order was granted.

The applicant was seeking an order to declare the behavior of the respondent unlawful and also to restrain the first and second respondents from instigating, calling for and organizing the strike. The applicant is an explosives and chemical speciality company which is being threatened by the respondent with a strike. The application was dismissed with costs.

This is an application to appeal for the reinstatement of the applicants. The applicants are the trade union and its members, the employees of the respondent which were retrenched due to re-organisation in their respective departments. The application was dismissed and of the costs.

Accused of murder, terrorism and possession of arms and ammunition. The respondents were each sentenced to death on count one, sentenced to eight years on count two and sentenced to eight years on count three, half of which will run concurrently with the sentence imposed in respect of the second count