The applicant seeks an order to stop the incorporation of Botshabelo township into Qwaqwa. The applicant is the resident of Botshabelo and feels that Qwaqwa does not have resources nor the manpower adequately to administer a town the size of Botshabelo. The order was granted.

The appeal was against a decision of the Cape High Court which found that the applicant was liable in damages for the wrongful and negligent conduct of the then provincial Minister of Agriculture, Planning and Tourism. The applicant is the Premier of the Western Cape who designated the provincial Minister of Agriculture, Planning and Tourism as the competent authority to administer the Act in that province. The appeal was upheld with costs including of two counsel.

The applicant was seeking an order to declare the by - laws promulgated in terms of Administrator's Notice 1398 dated 13 November 1988 to be ultra vires and no force and effect. The applicant is an organisation that represents the residents' interest in furtherance of better living conditions for the residents of Atteridgeville and Saulsville. The application was dismissed with costs including those of two counsel.

This is an appeal against a judgment of Van Der Merwe J in the Transvaal Provincial Division, discharging a rule nisi and dismissing an application of the appellant against the respondents. The applicant is a member and representative of the Bahurutse Ba Sebogodi tribe residing on the farm Braklaagte. The appeal was dismissed with costs that include of the two counsels.

The applicant was seeking an order to restrain the respondents from demolishing their property and evicting them. The applicant and his extended family were living on a farm and have lived on it for many years. The application was successful. The costs of the application were awarded to the respondent.

The applicant was appealing against the respondent's decision to evict her from the property she occupied. The applicant occupied the property together with her four children. The appeal succeeded.

The applicants seek an order to evict the respondents who occupy their land. The applicants are Groengras, a private company; Transnet, a public company, Minister of Land Affairs and Eskom, a juristic body and organ of state. A rule nisi was issued to the respondents.

The applicant was applying for an order to have the judgment against her rescinded. The applicant is one of the residents of Alexandra who were removed because of the risk of flooding and resettled in Diepsloot. The applicant cannot read and has never been to school, argued that there were no notices brought to her attention, she only heard that their houses would be destroyed from her kids. The judgment was rescinded and costs reserved.

This case is about whether a law which permits the sale in execution of people's homes because they have not paid their debts, thereby removing their security of tenure, violates the right to have access to adequate housing. The applicant is the registered owner of Erf 1825 Prince Albert on which a dwelling has been erected. A judgment was obtained by default against the applicant in an amount of R632, 45, interest thereon and costs in respect of monies lent and advance. The applicant's immovable property was attached to a warrant of execution and sold to the respondent. The order of the High Court was set aside.

The applicants were seeking relief against the respondents to reinstate them as labour tenants and to pay the applicants' costs of suit. The applicants are adults residing on the farm Daggakraal, Mpumalanga and the respondents are farmers who obtained a final order of eviction against them. A settlement was reached between the applicants and the respondents.