The applicants were seeking relief against the section 20(1)(aA) of the Sexual Offences Act. They felt that it criminalises only the conduct of the prostitutes and not that of the client. The applicants are the owner, salaried employee and the sex worker respectively. The appeals of the applicants were dismissed and their convictions and sentences confirmed.

The applicant was seeking an order declaring his detention in terms of Section 50(2) (b) of the Internal Security Act No 74 of 1982 to be unlawful, of no force and effect, that he be released from detention forthwith and for costs against the respondents. The applicant is a 31 year old male who lives and work in East London. The application was dismissed.

Affidavit by second respondent (AK de Jager). Incomplete.

This is a determination of an alleged unfair labour practice by the respondent to the applicants' clients. The applicant is a trade union seeking the reinstatement of its members to their employment as they were dismissed because they drew attention of the applicant to the irregularity of the respondent. The outcome of the determination was that the applicants' clients have to be formally reinstated.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondent. The applicant lived on the farm Groothoek from 1982 until 1996 when he was evicted by the respondent. The court ruled in favour of the applicant and there was no order as to costs.

The applicant was seeking a declaratory order that the first respondent cancellation of his right of occupation was unlawful and invalid. The applicant is the statutory lessee and the respondents are statutory lessors of the accommodation in the dispute. The applicant was granted the declaratory order.

The applicant instituted an action against the respondent and claimed R 2 500 damages in respect of an alleged assault on him by members of the South African Police. The applicant was a resident of Ciskei when it was part of South Africa and when it became a sovereign and independent State, he automatically became an alien in South Africa. The question with regard to this court case was what is the position if the non —domiciled foreigner was unable to give sureties by means of a cautio fideiussoria? The application dismissed with costs.

The applicant was seeking relief against the expropriation of land in Evaton.

This is an appeal against the dismissal of the respondent at work. The applicant is a close corporation which trades as a food outlet and its Tongaat branch manager accused the respondent for attempting to steal six sealed packets of seasoning. The applicant was ordered to compensate the respondent and there was no order as to the costs of the appeal.