The applicants were seeking an order to declare that the Seleka Tribe were entitled to convene a meeting of their tribe in the area of Beauty in the district of Vaalwater, Transvaal. The applicants are nine members of the Seleka Tribe against the respondents and representing the Seleka Tribe. The case was dismissed with costs including those of the two counsel.

The applicants were seeking an interdict to call off the strike of the respondents which was an illegal strike. A rule nisi was granted.

This is an application for reinstatement of the applicants in their former employment. The applicants were working for the respondent, a textile company. The application was consequently dismissed with no order as to costs.

The applicants were seeking reinstatement and restoration of labour practices which existed prior to the 24th August 1984. The applicants are a trade union and its members. The application was dismissed.

The applicants were seeking relief against the respondent. The applicants are the trade union and its members who refused to work overtime as the respondent their employer a steel processing company required them to. The dismissal of the second to thirty-sixth applicants was seen as an unfair labour practice and the respondent was required to pay applicants and accord them their benefits.

This is an application for reinstatement of the applicant back to her employment. The applicant was dismissed for bringing certain matters to the attention of senior management of the respondent a national broadcaster. The respondent was ordered to reinstate the applicant on terms and conditions not less favourable to the applicant.

The applicants were seeking relief against their dismissal at work. The applicants, a customer support clerk and a library services supervisor were accused of theft and both dismissed from work. The court ordered the respondent to reinstate the applicants.

The applicants were seeking relief for being unlawfully and unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The respondent was ordered to reinstate the applicants on terms and conditions no less favourable than those prevailing on the 16th of May 1985 and no order was made as to costs.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondents and to declare her husband's arrest, detention and transfer to Middelburg Prison unlawful. She is the wife of Frederick Emmanuel Hufkie and alleges that her husband was arrested at their home by members of South African Police Force in terms of the provisions of the Emergency Regulations. The application was dismissed with costs.