A brief history of NEUSA, L. Chisholm
- ZA HPRA A2294-A-A1
- Sous-série organique
- March 1983
Fait partie de National Education Union of South Africa records
452 résultats avec objets numériques Afficher les résultats avec des objets numériques
A brief history of NEUSA, L. Chisholm
Fait partie de National Education Union of South Africa records
Fait partie de Science Education Project
Fait partie de Market Theatre, records
Director Roy Sargeant.
Fait partie de Legal Aid Board records
A history of European education
Fait partie de Papers of Jan Hendrik Hofmeyr
typescript draft on education in South Africa by J.H. Hofmeyr (71p. typescript ); manuscript notes on education; provisional plan of the history, to be edited by Sir Fred Clarke and published in 8 volumes; correspondence between Hofmeyr and Clarke re Hofmeyr writing the South African section, part 2 of volume 7, 'British dominions overseas'.
A listing of relevant websites and bibliography
Fait partie de Missing Voices, Oral history project
A Mahlangu and Other vs Cim Deltak. Case No: NH 13/2/564 & 565
Fait partie de Legal Resources Centre, Records
The applicants were seeking relief against their dismissal at work. The applicants, a customer support clerk and a library services supervisor were accused of theft and both dismissed from work. The court ordered the respondent to reinstate the applicants.
Fait partie de Papers of Issy Heymann
A N Cita and Other vs Blyvooruitzitch Gold Mining Company LTD. Case No: NH 13/2/604 & 605
Fait partie de Legal Resources Centre, Records
The applicants were seeking relief for being unlawfully and unfairly dismissed by the respondent. The respondent was ordered to reinstate the applicants on terms and conditions no less favourable than those prevailing on the 16th of May 1985 and no order was made as to costs.
A. N Dlamini and Other vs I. S Pretorius. Case No: 546/89
Fait partie de Legal Resources Centre, Records
The applicants were seeking an order to declare their eviction unlawful. The applicants have lived on the farm Blaaukrantz in the district of Weenen for some years and the owner was now evicting them. The respondent was interdicted from unlawfully damaging or destroying any structural property owned or occupied by first applicant, rebuild the huts and fences demolished by him and pay the costs of the application.