This is a determination of an alleged unfair labour practice by the respondent to the applicants' clients. The applicant is a trade union seeking the reinstatement of its members to their employment as they were dismissed because they drew attention of the applicant to the irregularity of the respondent. The outcome of the determination was that the applicants' clients have to be formally reinstated.

This is an application for an order to direct the respondent to restore the labour practice and reinstate the applicants' clients on terms and conditions not less favourable to them than those that governed their employment prior to dismissal. The applicant is a trade union representing mine workers and the respondent a mining company. The respondent was ordered to reinstate applicant's clients.

This is a determination of the court that for the employees that are engaged or employed in the Sugar Manufacturing and Refining Industry, the classes of work discussed in court do fall within the said Industry and the agreement was not binding or applicable to but that conditions of employment other than on an agricultural basis should be negotiated between parties concerned.

The applicants were seeking an order to reinstate its members and effect payment of arrear wages. The applicant is a trade union and its members are the employees of the respondent, a wire weaving manufacturer. The case was dismissed.

The applicant applied for execution of the judgment should leave to appeal be granted to the respondent. The court ruled that Joseph Katofa be released from detention immediately. The costs of the application were to be costs in the appeal.

This is the application by the parents of the detainees declaring the arrest and detention of their children wrongful and unlawful. The applicants' children were detained under the State of Emergency. The application was dismissed with costs.

The applicant sought an order declaring the conditions of release to be invalid and that the costs of suit including the costs of two counsel be paid by the second respondent. The application succeeded to the limited extent that the fourth condition of release imposed by the second respondent on the applicant was declared void.

The applicant was seeking an order to declare the following regulations to be of no force and effect in law: regulation 7(i)(a) and any part of regulation of regulation 12(b), the reference to the United Democratic Front in the prohibition order and the definition of "news agency business" contained in regulation 1, 11 and sub paragraph (xi) of paragraph (a) of the subversive statement in regulation 1 and 9(2)(a)(v) of the media emergency regulations. The application was dismissed with costs.

This is the appeal against the arrest and detention of the applicant. The applicant is a member of an Indian group and unlawfully occupied premises in a White group area. She was arrested and sentenced to a fine of R50 of 15 days imprisonment, suspended for 3 years on condition that she doesn't commit the same offence. Judgment to be announced.

The two applicants were arrested and detained by the police in terms of Section 50 (1) of the Internal Security Act no. 74 of 1982. They were contending whether their detention was legal or not. The applications were dismissed with costs including the fees of two counsel.