The applicant was seeking relief on behalf of its members for reinstatement and payment for the period its members have been out of work. The applicant is a trade union representing its members who are the employees of the respondent dismissed from their employment. The application was dismissed.

The applicant seeks the Court review and set aside the third respondent's finding and decision that he was guilty under the provisions of section 20(f) of the Act on the bases that the third respondent. The applicant is a medical practitioner and specialist in public health since 1997 by the Health Department of the Eastern Cape Provincial government as the head of the Department of Public Health at Cecilia Makiwane Hospital. He made a public statement criticising the Minister of Health for refusing to provide a drug known as AZT to pregnant women living with HIV. An article was published in a newspaper stating that he was gathering support to seek manslaughter charges against the Minister of Health and a disciplinary action was taken against him. The appeal succeeded.

Documents in a dispute concerning the Ramakgopa Traditional Council.

The applicants seek an order ordering the first respondent to provide the applicants with basic temporary shelter, basic water and sanitation services and access to sufficient food, nutrition and health care services. The applicant is a group of about 30 000 people who were forcibly evicted from a portion of the remaining extent of the Farm Driefontein 85, IR, known as the Chris Hani 2 Informal Settlement.

The applicant seeks leave to appeal against the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The applicant is a community broadcaster contending that its fundamental rights under sections 9(1), 16, 34, 36 and 38 of the Constitution have been violated. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

The applicants were seeking an order to open the road closure by new farm owners because it was depriving the occupiers of access to their homestead.

The applicants are entities that own pharmacies and applying for leave to appeal against the validity of the Regulations relating to a Transparent Pricing System for Medicines and Scheduled Substances. The major issues in question are whether the fees were appropriate and the regulation of the single exit price was legal. Leave to appeal was granted and the first respondent was ordered to pay the costs including the costs of two counsel.

This case relates to the eviction of squatters from a farm in Benoni.

This is an application for leave to appeal which rose from the question of who bears responsibility for ensuring the safety of passengers travelling on commuter trains. A train commuter was stabbed in a train and died the following day. This happened during a period when numbers of security staff on commuter trains were significantly reduced. Leave for appeal was granted.

This is an application for an order against second and third respondents, interdicting and restraining them from assaulting, harassing, intimidating any employee of the first applicant. The applicants are the managers and owners of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront. The application was successful.