This is an appeal against the court's ruling that the State President of South Africa has exceeded his powers. The appeal was dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondents for his house arrest. The applicant was arrested and detained during the state of emergency, later released and kept under house arrest. The application was dismissed and each party was directed to pay its own costs.

The applicant, a university student was appealing against the judgment delivered by the Magistrate. The applicant was arrested for trespass when asked to leave the police station. The magistrate held that the applicant failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities and dismissed his claim with costs. The appeal was allowed with costs.

The applicant was seeking a relief against the respondents. The applicant is an adult male attorney employed by the Legal Resources Centre, detained by the police for not having a permit to be in KwaNdebele. The respondents apologised and agreed to pay the applicant R25 000-00 (Twenty five thousand rands).

The applicant who is an adult male delivery assistant was assaulted by the four members of the South African Defence Force. As a result of the assault, the applicant sustained injuries and lost the sight of his left eye. The applicant was suing Minister of Defence for an amount of R52 540 — 00. The respondent was held liable for the injuries and ordered to pay the applicant.

This a case against the respondents who are officers in charge of a squad of members of the police. The respondents are aged 37 years and 33 years old and accused of unlawfully and willfully instructing the members of their police squad to assaulting members of the public who were protesting. The respondents were found not criminally liable for their actions and the case was dismissed.

This is an application for an order against second and third respondents, interdicting and restraining them from assaulting, harassing, intimidating any employee of the first applicant. The applicants are the managers and owners of the Victoria and Alfred Waterfront. The application was successful.

The applicant was seeking relief in a form a payment an amount of R439 434.00 for injuries caused by the employee of the respondent. The applicant boarded the train at New Brighton station, Port Elizabeth, at about 1 am the following morning, the ticket examiner wrongfully and unlawfully assaulted the applicant by intentionally pushing, kicking him out of the door of the moving train. The applicant fell from the moving train and was seriously injured. The defendant was ordered to pay the applicant the costs including the cost of photographs.

The applicants are seeking relief against the judgment of the court in which the respondent was awarded the sum of R12 000 and interest thereon from the date of judgment to date of payment and costs and leave to appeal for defamation of character. The applicants are the editor, proprietor and publisher of the news magazine named 'Frontline'. The appeal was dismissed with costs, including of two counsel.

The applicant was seeking an order interdicting the respondents from distributing, selling, marketing or making available to any person the version of the book "Kerzner Unauthorised". During June 2000, it came to the applicant's knowledge that the respondents intended publishing a revised version of the book. The respondents were interdicted from publishing, distributing, selling, marketing or making available to any person. They were also ordered to pay the application costs and of the two counsel.