The applicant was seeking a relief against the respondents. The applicant is an adult male attorney employed by the Legal Resources Centre, detained by the police for not having a permit to be in KwaNdebele. The respondents apologised and agreed to pay the applicant R25 000-00 (Twenty five thousand rands).

The applicant was seeking an order directing the respondents to release her son from their custody and control, alternatively directing the respondents to produce him before the Court on a fixed date. The applicant is the mother of one of the three men who were arrested by the police at the Port Elizabeth airport. The application was dismissed with costs including of two counsel.

The applicants were seeking relief against their convictions and sentences. The applicants are among 177 people charged with contravening Section 18(1) of the Black Labour Relations Regulation Act, No. 48 of 1953 and were all convicted. Each applicant was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment, suspended for 5 years on certain conditions. The convictions and sentences of the applicants were set aside.

The applicant applied as a matter of urgency for his release from detention contending that his continued detention was unlawful in terms of the Aliens Control Act no 96 of 1991. He was arrested on 12 August 1994, charged on four counts under the Act. The application was successful.

This is an application to questioning the arrest and detention of the applicant's client whether it was done in a right way. The applicant is a trade union representing its client who was detained. The respondents were ordered jointly and severally to pay one half of the applicants' costs, including those incurred by them as a result of their employment of the services of two counsels.

The applicant applied for an order reviewing and setting aside his conviction and sentence. He was summoned to appear before the court of the Western Tembuland Regional Authority at Qamata on a charge of contempt of court and failed to appear. The conviction and sentence imposed upon the applicant in the Western Tembuland Regional Authority Court on 11 September 1997 were set aside. The respondent was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

The applicant, a university student was appealing against the judgment delivered by the Magistrate. The applicant was arrested for trespass when asked to leave the police station. The magistrate held that the applicant failed to prove his case on a balance of probabilities and dismissed his claim with costs. The appeal was allowed with costs.

The case concerns the constitutionality of statutory provisions that permit force to be used when carrying out an arrest. The applicants argued that the subsections of the Act should be read together as they were supplementing one another. The case was referred back to the High Court for resumption and conclusion of the criminal trial against the accused on the basis that section 49(2) of the said Act was constitutionally valid.

The applicant was seeking relief against the respondents for his house arrest. The applicant was arrested and detained during the state of emergency, later released and kept under house arrest. The application was dismissed and each party was directed to pay its own costs.

The applicants intend making an application to the court for an order to declare that the police of the Republic of Ciskei had no power of arrest or detention in Mgwali, Mgwali falls under the jurisdiction of the Republic of Republic of South Africa and that the Government of Ciskei has no law authority to exercise administrative or other powers within Mgwali. The applicants are the residents of Mgwali. The relief sought by the applicants was granted.