The LRC represented numerous clients of H&H Construction. These cases involved agreements to build houses at a fixed price. Building started once the half the contract amount had been paid. At a later stage the clients were forced to sign new contracts which differed substantially from the original contarct, , prejudicing the clients. They were also not informed of changes in the contracts. The LRC instituted actions against H&H Construction to cancel these contracts and reclaim money already paid. The company eventually went into liquidation, and owed 47 clients a total of R97000. Some of the earlier claims were successful, but once the company was liquidated, clients received only 24.6 cents in the rand. Client cases include: case 17747/82, Sibiya, N vs H&H Construction, case 18773, Kgosi, E vs H&H Construction, case 27969/84, Gwamanda, M vs H&H Construction, case 82381/84, Diale, H vs H&H Construction.

P Sekhanye operated a business in the area of Evaton, known as Ka Mohau Enterprises. He took deposits from people and undertook to build them a house in return. None of these houses were built. The LRC represented several clients of Ka Mohau Enterprises. Summary judgements were obtained for the amounts that had been paid, but these judgements were difficult to execute because Sekhanye could not be found. Eventually he was investigated by the South African Police and charged with fraud. He was sentenced to 7 years suspended for 5 years. He also had to repay the investors a total of R93 700, at R10 000 per month, but he failed to do so.

These files contain several claims against H&H Construction for the construction of houses in the homelands. However, the company then claimed the deposit was an agency fee. No houses were ever built. The material includes case material about individuals affected by breach of contract. There is also material about a defamation action against the Rand Daily Mail. The company declared bankruptcy. Material includes press clippings.

The client entered into a contract with Thutuka Builders who undertook to build the client a house. However, the builder failed to complete the work although the client had paid most of the contract price. The LRC assisted the client in obtaining judgement against Thutuka Builders for the outstanding work. A warrant of execution against property was later obtained when Thutuka Builders failed to comply with the order.

The clients both had contracts with KC Brokers and Homebuilders to build them houses. KC Brokers and Homebuilders then went into liquidation, and the LRC assisted clients in lodging claims with the administrators of the estate. The clients received 0.02 cents in the rand.

The client entered into a contract with Born Again Builders to build a house for the price of R12 550. When R12 040 had been paid the builder ceased building operations on the site. The LRC assisted the client in bringing suit, but the builder disappeared and the client appears to have dropped the matter.